|
Electronic editing means editing on screen with a software program that can track the editing changes and provide an edit trail for review. The editor usually has an option of printing a copy of the manuscript showing every alteration, only substantive changes, or only the revised version. Decisions regarding this "paper trail" are generally made between the author and editor: some authors want to see every change; others prefer clean, flowing copy. Selecting projects for on-screen editing
The straightforward manuscript that you expect will be lightly edited
presents few problems—whether edited conventionally or on screen.
Electronic editing offers limited additional benefit. Poor candidates for on-screen editing are manuscripts in disciplines requiring frequent use of interlinear symbols unavailable in standard word processing programs (e.g., chemistry, linguistics, logic), or ones with elements that cannot be directly translated into typesetting programs (e.g., projects with built-up equations or those having lots of tables). Benefits of electronic editing
The bottom line Part of the advantage of having editors edit on screen is the added
value they provide by bringing their trained eyes and ears, as well
as their familiarity with the project, to the electronic file. Because of the editor's skills, compositors do not need to make alterations
and can bypass the input department. Pages flow quickly and there is
no need to proofread. Weeks can thus be saved in page makeup and generation. Cost is another major benefit when using a corrected electronic file.
Although people who edit on disk generally charge more than their paper-and-pencil
colleagues, compositors may charge less when they can run pages from
clean disks—reducing the cost of composition by 10 percent on a
book with light corrections to as much as 35 percent on one with heavy
alterations. In an attempt to reduce the cost of correcting the file, a publisher
may turn to a service bureau instead of the compositor or the editor.
This masks accountability for the changes being made. The publisher
cannot guarantee the work of this third party and therefore cannot ask
for the best "clean file" discount from the compositor. Occasionally a publisher may turn to the author to input the editing
as the manuscript is being reviewed. This is an especially dangerous
path because it diverts the author's attention from manuscript approval,
it allows the author to insert unedited changes, it destroys the paper
trail, and it forces the publisher to carefully review the work again
to confirm that all changes are consistent and appropriate—an additional
step easily avoided by better alternatives available. The publisher
cannot guarantee the work of the author and therefore cannot ask for
the best discount from the compositor. The major benefit of editing online is that the editor can input changes with minimal cost and delay. If the editor is not able to input approved alterations, the compositor can still provide this task with skill, experience, speed, and accountability. At Generic, we are happy to advise on the suitability of a particular
project for electronic editing and to translate disks for editing on
screen into whatever software is most convenient for the editor. If the manuscript does not have an electronic file, we can scan a clean manuscript or keyboard a messy one. Traditionally this is the first stage of the composition process, but it can also be the first stage in getting a manuscript ready for editing on screen and a good way to control the schedule and costs of your books.
For further information, please email us email us . Please include your name, affiliation, and areas of interest, and we will get back to you quickly.
152 Starheim Road Stamford, NY 12167 607 652-BOOK (2665) 267 654-2416 (fax) email us |
Overview Generic's Home Page
Editing Editing on Galleys
Composition Generic House Styles
Full Service
Other |
|